##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Taoufik Hachimi Advanced Materials for Energy Transition (MATE), ENS Meknes, Moulay Ismail University, Morocco; Laboratory of Nuclear, Atomic, Molecular, Mechanical and Energetic Physics, University Chouaib Doukkali, El Jadida, Morocco https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3567-8511 Fouad Ait Hmazi Laboratory of Nuclear, Atomic, Molecular, Mechanical and Energetic Physics, University Chouaib Doukkali, El Jadida, Morocco Fatima Ezzahra Arhouni Laboratory of Nuclear, Atomic, Molecular, Mechanical and Energetic Physics, University Chouaib Doukkali, El Jadida, Morocco Hajar Rejdali Laboratory of Engineering Sciences for Energy, University Chouaib Doukkali, El Jadida, Morocco Yahya Riyad Laboratory of Engineering Sciences for Energy, University Chouaib Doukkali, El Jadida, Morocco Fatima Majid Laboratory of Nuclear, Atomic, Molecular, Mechanical and Energetic Physics, University Chouaib Doukkali, El Jadida, Morocco

Abstract

This study presents an experimentally calibrated methodology to enhance the predictive accuracy of finite element simulations for Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) parts in Abaqus by replacing idealized filament geometry with a physically accurate “corrected virtual raster section.” A Box-Behnken Design of Experiments (DoE) across 27 ABS specimens systematically quantifies how key printing parameters, layer thickness, raster width, extrusion temperature, and print speed, influence the true cross-sectional geometry of deposited filaments, as measured via Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). These data inform a predictive mathematical model that transforms the conventional circular filament shape into an experimentally grounded oval-rectangular profile, accurately capturing extrusion-induced flattening and lateral spreading. The calibrated virtual section is integrated into a custom Python-based tool that parses G-code toolpaths and sweeps the corrected geometry along deposition trajectories to generate high-fidelity, mesh-ready Abaqus models. The workflow is validated through tensile testing of ASTM D638 specimens printed at 0°, 45°, and 90° raster orientations (n=3 per orientation). Error analysis against the experimental mean demonstrates that the corrected model reduces simulation errors from catastrophic levels in the non-corrected approach (7–92% relative error, 2.5–19 MPa absolute) to engineering-grade precision (0.03–7% relative error, ≤1.3 MPa absolute). This workflow bridges G-code to physical behavior, enabling reliable simulation of FDM anisotropy.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Section
Integrity of materials and structures

How to Cite

Experimental calibration of a virtual raster section for high-accuracy FDM simulation in Abaqus . (2026). Fracture and Structural Integrity, 20(76), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.76.03

How to Cite

Experimental calibration of a virtual raster section for high-accuracy FDM simulation in Abaqus . (2026). Fracture and Structural Integrity, 20(76), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.76.03

Most read articles by the same author(s)